Wednesday, December 17, 2008

When It Comes To Fat Loss Exercise Alone Is Not Enough


The study below shows us how important proper nutrition really is, without modifying lifestyle and learning how to eat properly significant changes in body composition are nearly impossible to achieve.



When Exercise Doesn't Work
by John M Berardi, PhD, CSCS



This week I've got no fancy introduction. I've got no "journalistic hook." You see, I recently had an "ah ha" moment that I've simply got to share with you. And here it is...


Exercise doesn't work.


Now that might sound shocking coming from a guy with big biceps and 8% body fat; from a guy that recommends lots of exercise, at least 5 hours per week.

So if this all seems incongruent, I guess I should qualify the statement above. I guess I should have probably said:


Exercise, ALONE, doesn't work.


My Wake-Up Call
My coming to this realization wasn't an easy process.

I've been working with clients for over 15 years now and although I always knew that diet was an important part of the training equation, I also always harbored some subconscious notion that if I worked my clients hard enough, their lack of dietary effort would be overcome by my super-effective training programs.

Sure, I wanted them to eat well. But if they didn't (more like, wouldn't), somewhere deep inside it seemed ok. I figured in the battle of training vs. diet, training would win.

Now, I never said this aloud. However, somewhere I'm sure I felt it. So it wasn't until I was slapped in the face with some cold, hard, objective data that I realized how wrong I'd been.

The Texas Study
These data came in the form of a study I recently worked on at the University of Texas.







In this study, nearly 100 initially sedentary participants either stayed sedentary (about half of them) OR began exercising (the other half). They exercisers were given a program to follow that added up to about 5 1/2 to 6 hours of activity per week and that lasted for a total of 12 weeks. The non-exercisers did nothing for the 12 weeks except show up for measurement sessions.

These individuals, as stated above, did no exercise before the study began. As a result of this sedentary lifestyle, they averaged between 35% and 40% body fat (according to DEXA scans).

Once the study began, the training group gathered together for 3 weight training sessions per week and 2 group exercise / interval sessions per week. All the training was designed by myself and overseen by a weightlifting coach and group exercise coach. So there was a pretty high level of quality control there.

Now, it's important to note that we didn't alter the participant's eating at all. And we did this on purpose. We wanted to test the effects of exercise alone - without diet. In other words, the question became:




"Without a dietary intervention, can exercise alone reshape a person's body?"



At the end of the 12 week study, we got our answer:



"Not so much..."



That's right, when analyzing the data, I was shocked to find that even with 3+ hours of training per week with a weightlifting coach and 2+ hours of training per week with a body-weight circuit instructor didn't really work. The formerly sedentary participants didn't do much better than their couch-sitting counterparts.

That's right, without dietary control, 12 weeks of high intensity training produced a fairly disappointing 1% loss of body fat. In terms of raw data, the participants lost only 1 pound of fat and gained 2 pounds of lean vs. the placebo group.

Frankly, that sucks.

The Machete Perspective
Now, imagine you're overweight (about 38% body fat) and you decide to take the plunge, to hire a personal trainer, and to get in shape for perhaps the first time in your life.

So, you decide to buy a training package, one that contains 60 sessions (5 sessions per week for 12 weeks). The cost, per session, is 50 bucks, the going rate. So you plunk down 3 grand and start your initial 12 week fitness journey.

You don't expect big things...you just expect to start moving in the right direction. So you're patient. You attend all your training sessions, you get to know your trainer really well, spending over 60 hours with him or her. You stay off the scale, not wanting to jinx yourself.

Then, at the end of the 12 weeks, you weigh-in.





Body weight -
You were overweight, obese in fact, to start with. Well, if you simply exercised (without changing your diet and following the protocol above) you now weigh one pound more!

About to go crazy, your trainer talks you down off the cliff. You probably gained a lot of muscle while losing a lot of fat, he or she says. So it's time to do a body comp test.


Fat weight -
Ok, here's the moment of truth. You're sure there must have been some fat loss. Drumroll please...

If you followed the protocol from above, you're down one, uninspiring, unnoticable pound of fat.

"What the heck!? Can I NOW be pissed?"


Lean weight -
Because you weigh one pound more, and lost one pound of fat, that means that your formerly sedentary butt put on 2 lbs of lean mass.

That's nice and all. But that wasn't the goal! You wanted to lose fat. This is when your anger kicks in.


So, you spent 3000 bucks and 60 hours working your ass off in the gym. And your ass didn't change one bit! Is it time to grab a machete and take that good for nothing trainer's head clean off?

It's Not A Fluke
Now, when I first saw these data, I thought they were a fluke. I got the research team together on the phone and chewed them out. There must have been a data mix-up.

I mean, seriously, 12 weeks of hard training and only one pound of fat lost vs. no training at all. Was this some sort joke? Did they screw up the data collection? Did the research participants skip out on sessions? What was the deal?!?

Despite my insistence, there were no errors. The participants showed up. They trained hard. The data were collected properly. The participants just didn't progress. And, for the first time, I started asking the question honestly.


Can a solid training program alone get people into great shape?


Note I said "solid" training program. In the past I figured people weren't getting results because their training program was awful and perhaps so was their diet.

But, as a result of this new study, a study in which the training protocol was solid, the answer appeared to be no. A solid training program alone wasn't enough to get people into great shape.

Other Research Support
With a new sense of purpose, I started digging around in the research. And I quickly found another recent study suggesting the exact same thing.

This study, published in the April 2008 issue of Nutrition and Metabolism, demonstrated that after 10 weeks of training (3 endurance sessions and 2 strength sessions per week - the flip flop of our study), 38 previously overweight, sedentary subjects also saw minimal changes in body composition with training.


Body Weight -
In this study, neither the control (no exercise) group or the exercise group significantly changed their body weight. Both groups saw about a 0.6lb loss in body weight on average. But again, neither change was significant.

Fat Mass -
When it came to fat mass, the exercise group lost 2.4lbs while the control group lost 0.9lbs. This means that the 50 exercise sessions lead to a mere 1.5lb fat loss vs doing nothing. Better than a kick in the teeth, I guess. But not all that stellar.

Lean Mass -
The exercise group grained 1.7lbs of lean mass while the control group gained 0.2lbs of lean mass. This means that the 50 exercise sessions led to a 1.5lb gain in lean mass vs doing nothing at all. Again, not bad. But not great either.


Different vs. Important
Sure, in both studies, the changes were "statistically significant." In other words, participants did lose more fat and gain more lean mass when training vs. not training. However, let's not confuse different with important. After all, these changes are small, really small. And I would suggest, unimportant.

I mean, come on now, people exercise to actually change their bodies in noticeable, measurable ways. They want to fit better into their clothes. They want to go from overweight to normal weight. They want to be able to walk up the stairs without getting winded. They want to lower their cholesterol.

In my estimation, and it might just be me, they're just not all that interested in dumping big dollars and lots of time into something that leads to a one pound fat loss. Seriously, that's not all that good.

The Lesson - No, It's Not To Stop Exercising!
At this point you might be wondering if it's my advice to stop exercising. Of course not! Exercise is critically important to looking better, feeling better, and performing better every single day. And don't you forget it!

However, my point is that exercise ALONE just doesn't cut it. What you really need is exercise PLUS a sound nutritional program. Now that's just what the doctor ordered.






Consider what happens when people actually eat well...

In our recent Precision Nutrition Body Transformation Challenge, the average fat loss for all of our participants was 1/2% (or 1lb) lost per week! Remember, in the studies above, they lost about 1 to 1.5lbs in 10-12 weeks!

That's almost at 10-fold increase in effectiveness when people added the Precision Nutrition plan to their training system.

Further, our finalists (the top performers) saw the following results:


• Finalist #1 lost about 30lbs in 16 weeks – losing 23lbs of fat, or about 1.4lbs of fat per week.


• Finalist #2 - lost about 16lbs in 16 weeks – losing 23lbs of fat, or about 1.4lbs of fat per week.


• Finalist #3 - lost 37lbs in 16 weeks – losing 27lbs of fat, or about 1.7 lbs of fat per week.


• Finalist #4 - lost 25lbs during 16 weeks – losing 35lbs of fat, or about 2.2lbs of fat per week.


• Finalist #5 - lost 37lbs during 16 weeks – losing 31lbs of fat, or about 1.9lbs of fat.

Note: each of our finalists followed one of the training programs available in the PN Member's Resource Section (member's only) and our nutritional guidelines outlined in the Precision Nutrition System.

Also consider the research study discussed above, the one published in Nutrition and Metabolism.

In this study, there was actually a 3rd group. And this group, in addition to exercising, supplemented each day with 2 nutrient-dense meal replacement supplements. Each supplement contained 300 calories, 5g fat, 25g carbs, and 40g protein and a host of vitamins and minerals. And while the exercise-only group saw small fat losses and muscle gains, the exercise plus supplement group, was a different story.

Body Weight -
The exercise+supplement group lost 4lbs of total body weight. This compared to the 0.6lbs lost in the exercise alone group.

Fat Mass -
The exercise+supplement group also lost 6lbs of total body fat. This compared to the 2.4lbs lost in the exercise alone group.

Lean Mass -
The exercise+supplement group gained about 1.8lbs of total lean body mass. This compared to the 1.7lb gained in the exercise alone group.

So, as you can see, even something as simple as adding a high quality protein drink or MRP can improve fat loss vs. exercise alone.

But, again, nothing is as effective as following a solid nutrition program while exercising properly.

Trainers Take Note
At this point, I've gotta serve notice to trainers. Folks, if you're not providing nutrition advice to your clients, that's a real problem.

A trainer selling a client exercise alone is equivalent to a car salesman selling a car with no engine. As you've already seen, the thing just won't go.

Now, I don't want to seem as if I'm taking shots at ALL trainers because I love the service many of them provide. However, I do have something to say to those trainers who don't have a nutrition system in place.

Take my advice...incorporating nutrition isn't a "nice to have," it's a "need to have". So don't miss the boat.

Exercisers, Also Take Note
For you folks who aren't trainers yet who are looking to look better, feel better, and perform at the top of your game, the lesson should be obvious.

You can train as hard as you want. However, without some attention to your nutritional intake, you simply can't expect inspiring, noticeable results.

To get your nutrition program straight, click here…

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Rapid Fat Loss Circuit Training to Build The Ultimate Dream Body


Traditionally most resistance training workouts have been performed in a straight set format. Meaning you perform a certain amount of reps per exercise or complete as many reps as possible resting anywhere from 30 seconds to five minutes based on your training goals. Repeat the set for a certain number of times based on your goals. To increase fat loss and lean muscle gain emphasize shorter rest periods. For a strength or power emphasis, longer rest periods are the proper prescription.

So, why is this not the ideal format anymore? Even though straight sets are extremely easy to comprehend for new fitness enthusiasts, they are also an exceedingly inefficient way to arrange your exercises. In most commercial gyms you’ll typically see individuals who perform three sets of 10 reps for let’s say the leg extension. They pump out 10 reps, go to the water fountain, converse with like-minded buddies, catch the newest highlights on ESPN, and then gingerly walk back to the nautilus machine to start their second set. In general, 3-5 minutes between sets in not uncommon for most people, guys in particular. At a pace of three sets of 10 on the leg extension means it would take up to approximately 15 minutes to complete only one movement pattern (a horizontal push). All together it would take at least an hour to perform four different exercises and almost 2 hours for a sound workout!

A more successful and time-efficient approach to ordering your exercises is utilizing an alternating set format. You will perform one exercise, rest for a short period of time, then perform another non-competing exercise (one not involving the same muscle group), rest for a short period of time, and so forth. When alternating sets you work different areas of your body when you would otherwise be resting with the straight set format. Plus, by working another area of your body with a non-competing exercise you allow your body to recover from the previous exercise(s). This increases your work to rest ratio or workout density. The result is improved training economy and more work accomplished in less time, the cornerstone of any fat loss program. There are several ways to perform alternating sets outlined below:

1.) Supersets: Alternate between two different non-competing exercises (e.g. upper body and lower body such as dumbbell press and squats)

2.) Trisets: Alternate between three different exercises (e.g. push, pull, and lower body such as barbell press, lat pulldowns, and deadlifts)

3.) Circuits: Alternate between four or more different exercises

Though supersets and trisets are excellent alternating set options, I believe circuit training is by the far the best option time and time again. To demonstrate why, let’s examine my favorite circuit training template using timed set intervals:

The 50-10 Five Exercise Circuit: You will alternate between 50 seconds of work and 10 seconds of rest for all five exercises in the following 5-minute circuit:

Exercise#1- Squats

Exercise#2- Dips

Exercise#3- Single-Leg Hip Extensions

Exercise#4- Pull-ups

Exercise#5- Leg Raises

Perform this circuit up to four times for a 20-minute total body fat burning workout.

Basically, in the same 15 minutes that it took to get in three sets on the leg extension you could have gotten in three sets of five different exercises for a staggering total of 15 work sets! Plus, the intensity on each exercise will be just as high as in the straight set format because in this five exercise circuit you will have full recovery with over four minutes before you return to any given exercise (just as you did with the straight set format described earlier).

To recap, the key to creating the optimal hormonal environment for fat loss is to perform each exercise with maximal intensity separated by brief rest periods in order to accumulate a high volume of total body work in the shortest amount of time. Circuit training provides for the best of both worlds and is thus simply unmatched for concurrently maximizing fat loss and lean muscle gain. Use the following template I use with my many boot camp clients for some killer, yet simple fat loss circuits:

Exercise#1- Double-Leg

Exercise#2- Push

Exercise#3- Single-Leg

Exercise#4- Pull

Exercise#5- Core


Keep checking for some more great circuit training workouts from my Dream Body Boot Camps in the weeks to come ;)

"Where Dream Bodies Come True"


Doug Parra, C.S.C.S.

http://www.dreambodybootcamps.com

Friday, September 26, 2008

The Killer at Large- Michael Phelps Helps Promote Junk Food?????



Let me ask all of you a question? What do you think is causing the obesity problem today? Can you name two things? This is just a little quiz to see where you are at right now.

I think there are several factors:

1.) It all starts with people specifically parents when we talk about the youth of America. I have always asked myself where do kids get the money to feed themselves? Most kids I know do NOT work so that leaves the parents flipping the bill for unhealthy food.

2.) Business- this an interesting topic as I do agree that food manufactures could definitely be helping the population by not manufacturing and MARKETING crap food but we cannot put the blame solely on them. Why? It is a simple matter of economics Supply vs. Demand. If everyone stopped buying McDonald’s tomorrow they would either be put out of business or would be forced to supply what health conscious people are asking for. We have to acknowledge the power of choice that we have and we have a TON of power but we are very confused and misguided.

Our value system(s) that we are taught at a very young age are critical to one’s health- physical, mental, emotional and spiritual health.

Psychological Statistics say the by age 4 we are already 50% programmed, by age 10 80% programmed and by age 18 95% programmed. This means the we have 5% that is unprogrammed that we will have to tap into somehow to re-program the majority of the already programmed 95% that has some seriously bad programming.

I think legislation could help and pass laws banning a whole slew of farming practices and ingredients that should never be allowed to put into foods. But that will probably take a while. Schools don’t emphasize exercise anymore the way they used to which is also a part of the problem. The internet and technology has also made society addicted to instant gratification of all kinds- instant messaging, text messaging teaches people not to take time and consciously think about what they are feeling, saying or typing. It’s all about a “quick fix” “silver bullet (pill)” and it’s a shame. I think Gandhi said “ You cannot speed up your efforts to live a slower paced life anymore than you can fight for peace”.

Education is the key because there are people out there that are starving for good information based on science that will change their lives for the better.

I could go on and on this topic. But I’ll stop for now.

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Precision Nutrition Strategies

Click Here!



Hi Everyone,

I have another great piece of information for you from Dr. John Berardi. This time I bring to you his Precision Nutrition Strategies. It has a ton of great topics such as The Rules of Good Nutrition, Balancing Dietary Acids, Revving Up Your Metabolism and Eating Strategies for the Road. Once again please give me your feedback and let me know what you think of it his material? Just click on the link below and you will be able to download his Precision Nutrition Strategies for free.